Fri Oct 3 22:23:59 GMT 2003 Monoculture may be bad, but it's unavoidable
Link: Is Computer Monoculture The Way Of The World?
Nobody was ever forced to buy a Microsoft product. Everyone who has ever bought a Microsoft product has chosen to do so and has done so over the alternatives, which have always included computers from Apple and UNIX-based computers, and now include Linux from numerous sources, many of them free.
This is completely wrong, and is a large part of what the Justice Department suit was about. In fact, Microsoft threatened and bullied PC vendors whenever they tried to offer consumers alternatives like Unix and Linux.
Speculate instead, about a world in which multiple operating systems are in widespread use. In terms of security we would almost certainly be better off, even though most of those operating systems have their own rich sets of vulnerabilities. For example, there's a long list of Linux vulnerabilities. Most of them are in peripheral packages, but this doesn't usually matter; nobody runs just the Linux kernel.
Another misleading statement. In fact many people do NOT run ftp servers, sendmail, ssh or other software that has had security problems. Even if you do run them, in the Linux and Unix market, your choices are much wider: almost everyone may run mail, but there's sendmail, qmail, smail, mmdf, and many, many more.
For the most part, ordinary people don't buy "alternative" operating systems like Linux because these platforms are ill-suited to the tasks they need to do. Apple is able to keep a non-trivial market share with a completely proprietary platform, and think of how much more they would sell if they gave up on their own hardware and sold the Mac OS for the standard PC platform. The developers making UNIX and Linux should get their own products up to these standards before talking seriously about getting large numbers of users to run them.
Huh? Apple sells hardware tightly integrated with their OS. They'd be idiots to port to Wintel and they know that better than anyone. As to that "ill-suited" statement, there's an Orwellian turn around if I ever heard one: in fact, it's because Linux and Unix are so well suited to certain tasks that they are bought. Most people buy Microsoft because they just don't know any better. I sell a Linux based mail server and couldn't tell you how many customers have been amazed that they can use IE with it. It's massive ignorance that drives most Microsoft purchases, and little else.
That "up to standards" crack is such nonsense, too. People think Microsoft became dominant because it made such great software, but in fact it was bullying, buying out or destruction of competition, predatory pricing (until the market was secured, of course) and other sleazy tactics that built the Empire. But the general public doesn't know that, and apparently neither does the columnist who wrote this nonsense.
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar