Microsoft BIOS

Fri Oct 3 21:32:57 GMT 2003 Microsoft BIOS

Link: Microsoft moves to integrate Windows with BIOS


Hate these ads?

This is scary. Obviously the DRM part is a concern, but I think there is even more to worry about. If Microsoft gets very cozy with Phoenix at this level, what's to stop Windows from working better on Phoenix BIOSes and even more disturbing, what's to stop the BIOS from NOT working well with Linux et al. "accidentally on purpose"?

They've done this before:

(From Hard Drive: Bill Gates and the Making of the Microsoft Empire)

According to one Microsoft programmer, a few of the key people working on DOS 2.0 had a saying at the time that "DOS isn't done until Lotus won't run." They managed to code a few hidden bugs into DOS 2.0 that caused Lotus 1-2-3 to breakdown when it was loaded. "There were as few as three or four people who knew this was being done," the employee said. He felt the highly competitive Gates was the ringleader.

Coding a BIOS that would run slowly or quirkily with non-Microsoft OSes wouldn't be hard - in fact, they could even admit it and explain it away as unavoidable. People trying out alternatives would have a less than pleasant time, might have to disable desirable features, give up certain peripherals or accept lowered performance - who knows?

Scary stuff, I think.








Comments
CommentsBlog555 :
How does this fit in with Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI)? http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/developer/0,39020387,2130826,00.htm

NilsR

I wonder how that fits at all. Sounds like Intel has something, but they say they aren't going to manufacture it. So that must mean they want others to license it. Has anyone?

--TonyLawrence

"...what's to stop Windows from working better on Phoenix BIOSes and even more disturbing, what's to stop the BIOS from NOT working well with Linux et al. 'accidentally on purpose'?"

Assuming Gates got his way, I could forsee where eventually the BIOS would not run anything BUT Windows. At that point, they might as well burn the entire operating system into EPROM and not bother with loading it from disk. Is there nothing that this man Gates won't stop at to get his way???

--BigDumbDinosaur

Add your comments

Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)

Or use any RSS reader

Delivered by FeedBurner


Views for this page
Today This Week This Month This Year  Overall
1312131 1,930

Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here

pavatar.jpg
More:
       - Blog
       - Microsoft




Unix/Linux Consultants

Your ad here - $48.00 yearly!

http://echo3.net/ Unix/Linux Custom Applications, Web Hosting, C/C++ Programming Courses


SCO, OpenServer, UnixWare, software, servers, security, networks, installation, administration, troubleshooting, maintenance, Watchguard, firewalls, VPNs, e-mail. Visit us at http://opensystemscomputing.com and www.go2unix.com.


http://www.vss3.com SCO/Caldera OpenServer, Unixware & Linux. Tarantella & Non-stop Clustering



Twitter
  • Nov 21 07:55
    @loudmouthman: correct, but how do you prove ANYTHING like that is accurate? You can't. A text file is no better or worse than anything.
  • Nov 21 07:40
    @loudmouthman: well, a digital signature could prove it hadn't been altered. Text is no more insecure than anything else in that sense.









Change Congress


Related Posts


Publish your articles, comments, book reviews or opinions here!