A.P. Lawrence

Why we don't need software patents and copyrights

Wed Sep 10 10:32:22 GMT 2003 Why we don't need software patents and copyrights

Link: Control of creativity? Fashion's secret

I don't have much to add to this, except perhaps that it's too bad that such an intelligent observation wasn't made years ago when the software patent barrier was first broken (the article speaks to music and movies, but the base concept applies to software too). If this silliness had been squashed then, who knows how different the world would be today?

Let's just take some paragraphs from there and rewrite them as though this were true:

It is precisely because software pervades so many aspects of our lives that we fail to appreciate the "social ecology" that supports it - the open sharing, unauthorized innovations, and creative appropriations. To be sure, the software industry aggressively protects its brand names and logos, utilizing trademarks and licensing agreements. In most cases, however, the actual creative design of applications is not owned by anyone. The accounting software used by a Hollywood store owner can be knocked off immediately and legally appear days later on store shelves.

For virtually all players in software, some form of derivation, recombination, imitation, revival of old styles, and outright knockoff is the norm. Few denounce, let alone sue, the appropriator for "creative theft." They're too busy trying to stay ahead of the competition through the sheer power of their design and marketing prowess.

The software world understands that creativity is a collaborative and community affair. It's far too big, robust, and evolving for any one player to "own" as a legal entitlement. Long lineages of programmers from Kernighan and Pike to Stevens, to Eric S. Raymond, and Linus Torvalds have shown that programmers necessarily must learn, adopt, and adapt from those who have blazed previous trails. If one were to deconstruct their work, an evolutionary chain of distinct themes, references, design nuances, and outright appropriations could be discerned.

Still makes perfect sense, doesn't it?

Comments /Blog/B501.html
CommentsBlog501 :

"Still makes perfect sense, doesn't it?"

Of course, except to the government wonks who think that some cute little math operation in some obscure subroutine in an equally obscure program is so wonderful that it deserves the protection of a patent.

The patent and copyright authorities have totally lost sight of just what patents and copyrights were meant to protect. The predictable result will be gross theft of "intellectual property."

--BigDumbDinosaur


Add your comments

Why no "Digg this!" etc.?

Forget the expense of flying to New England. Forget hotel and meals costs.
Installation and light training Boston and New England

Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)

Need eyes on the ground at your customer's site?
Installation and light training Boston and New England
Reliable and experienced, punctual and professional.

Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here