Microsoft proprietary information in SCO

(Traditional format)

Tue Nov 23 13:25:59 2004 Microsoft proprietary information in SCO
Posted by Bruce Garlock

I recently had to edit /etc/conf/cf.d/mtune to change a shared memory parameter on an OSR5 machine, and noticed this statement at the top:


Hate these ads?

* This Module contains Proprietary Information of Microsoft * Corporation and should be treated as Confidential.

What on earth could Microsoft have that is proprietary with tuning the SCO kernel?


- Bruce Garlock



Comments
CommentsBlog1142 :

---November 23, 2004

All kinds of things. Microsoft (like IBM etc.) has all manner of patents. No doubt Microsoft royalties help keep SCO expensive, too. It's all pretty disgusting when you really see what is going on. We get sold on the idea that patents are for protecting the lone inventor, but in fact nothing could be farther from the truth. Patents let big companies keep on bullying the little folk.


--TonyLawrence



---November 23, 2004

I only saw this (c)opyright in mtune. The other files do not have the copyright notice in it. Why would they put it in mtune, and not some of the other files in /etc/conf/cf.d?


Add your comments
cartoon
Need eyes on the ground at your customer's site?
Installation and light training Boston and New England
Reliable and experienced, punctual and professional.


Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)

Or use any RSS reader

Delivered by FeedBurner





Views for this page
Today This Week This Month This Year  Overall
11130376 2,049

/Blog/B1142.html copyright November 2004 Bruce Garlock All Rights Reserved

Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here

More:
       - Administration
       - Kernel/Internals
       - OSR5
       - Blog




Unix/Linux Consultants

Your ad here - $48.00 yearly!

http://www.cleverminds.net Need expert advice? Want a second opinion? CleverMinds is a one-stop-shop for a wide range of technology solutions. We support Unix, Linux, SCO as well as CMS, ecom, blogs, podcasts, search engines consulting and more. Contact us at web2.0@cleverminds.net 0r (617) 894-1282


http://www.m3ipinc.com Security, firewalls, ids, audits, vulnerability assesments, BS7799, HIPAA, GLB, incident handling


SCO, OpenServer, UnixWare, software, servers, security, networks, installation, administration, troubleshooting, maintenance, Watchguard, firewalls, VPNs, e-mail. Visit us at http://opensystemscomputing.com and www.go2unix.com.



Twitter
  • Nov 21 07:55
    @loudmouthman: correct, but how do you prove ANYTHING like that is accurate? You can't. A text file is no better or worse than anything.
  • Nov 21 07:40
    @loudmouthman: well, a digital signature could prove it hadn't been altered. Text is no more insecure than anything else in that sense.









Change Congress


Related Posts


Publish your articles, comments, book reviews or opinions here!