Get APLawrence.com by RSSWindows Isn't Ready For The Desktop
Fri Jul 30 15:11:12 2004 Windows Isn't
Ready For The Desktop
Posted by BigDumbDinosaur
Search Keys: Linux, Windows, Desktop, Workstation
Referencing: http://thelinuxbox.org/Desktop.php
We often hear comments to the effect that "Linux is not ready for use on a workstation desktop." Well, in this amusing but factual article, author Sean Parsons turns the tables on Microsoft and asserts that it is Windows, not Linux, that isn't ready for the desktop.
Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)
| Views for this page | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | This Week | This Month | This Year | Overall |
| 2 | 17 | 53 | 501 | 3,481 |
/Blog/B1024.html copyright July 2004 BigDumbDinosaur All Rights Reserved
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Your ad here - $48.00 yearly!
http://www.vss3.com SCO/Caldera OpenServer, Unixware & Linux. Tarantella & Non-stop Clustering
http://thatitguy.com Business networking servers, Linux and Unix experts. In business since 1997! Windows and Exchange to Samba and Scalix migration experts.
UBB Computer Services Support for Openserver, Unixware and Linux. Windows integration with Unix/Linux servers. Hardware, Backup and Networking issues. Located near Sacramento CA, we provide onsite support throughout Northern CA and Nationwide via remote access. We are a SCO Authorized Partner and a Microlite BackupEdge Certified Reseller.
- Nov 21 07:55
@loudmouthman: correct, but how do you prove ANYTHING like that is accurate? You can't. A text file is no better or worse than anything. - Nov 21 07:40
@loudmouthman: well, a digital signature could prove it hadn't been altered. Text is no more insecure than anything else in that sense.
Related Posts
Publish your articles, comments, book reviews or opinions here!
CommentsBlog1024 :
---July 30, 2004
As I've said before, no one who really *uses* a computer could possibly enjoy using Windows. Good article; thanks for the link.
--TonyLawrence
---July 30, 2004
One odd thing that people do is that when they talk about Linux on the desktop they grade Linux using Windows as the ruler.
One example is how they take a person that has been using MS Office apps in a professional enviroment for years, and then ask them to grade how easy it is to use.
Also you have much more subtler things that people do. MS has people brainwashed on how a computer operates. Windows ISN'T easy to use. The UI isn't slick and wonderfull. It isn't even that consistant, which is one major critism that Linux apps have. It's just that they've been using it for almost 10 years now and Windows is just what they are used too. (Mac OS X in comparision is actually easy to use.)
Then you have people that should know better that don't. Advanced users, or at least people that considure themselves advanced. They say things like how Linux should ditch the old Unix style directories (/etc/ /usr/ /lib/ and so on) which is SO confusing and that Linux needs to adapt a filing system that makes sense... Like Window's C: drive.
Which just boggles my mind how a person could feel that way.
--Drag
---July 31, 2004
Add your comments