Opinions vs. Hopes

Mon Jul 26 12:16:48 2004 Opinions vs. Hopes
Posted by Tony Lawrence
Search Keys: sco lawsuit
Referencing: /Lawsuit

Once again I have been chastised for refusing to have an opinion on SCO's chances of winning or losing their cases. What those who get so angry about this fail to understand is the difference between hope and opinion. I HOPE SCO loses. I'm not qualified to have an opinion on whether or not they will.


Hate these ads?

I am not a lawyer, and I don't have intimate knowledge of Unix history or the various contracts and agreements involved here. I'm sure there are a few people truly qualified to have an opinion in these matters, but I doubt we've heard from any of them here or at GrokLaw.

That, by the way, is one question I've had all along: where are you going to find anyone who is both qualified to judge this but doesn't already have an opinion or an axe to grind?

I can look at the facts and wonder how in hell ELF could possibly be claimed by SCO, but that's no different than my wondering how in hell the U.S. Supreme court has ruled that a U.S. citizen can be held indefinitely without trial or even being charged. Both things may astound me, but I'm not qualified to argue about either. People can jump up and down screaming that ELF is in the public domain, and I can do the same screaming that Article VI says "accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial". Apparently that doesn't mean what I think it means and it may be that the status of ELF isn't what it seems to be either.

And then, of course, there's the people factor. I might guess how David Souter will vote on a particlar issue based on what I know of his politics, but he can surprise me, With SCO's suits, I know nothing about the various judges, their general intelligence, their tech background, their political leanings, etc. so how on earth could I even begin to estimate what they might think of evidence I haven't seen?

It would be ludicrous for me to have an opinion on this. I have hopes about the outcome, not opinions. Further, my hopes for this are just part of a larger yearning for limiting corporate power and allowing room for innovation. My hopes have been slightly buoyed by some developments here, but dampened by other occurences, such as Microsoft's continuing advancement.




Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)

Or use any RSS reader

Delivered by FeedBurner





Views for this page
Today This Week This Month This Year  Overall
2822355 3,373

Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here

pavatar.jpg
More:
       - Opinion
       - Blog
       - Lawsuit
       - OSR5




Unix/Linux Consultants

Your ad here - $48.00 yearly!

http://bcstechnology.net Full service Linux & UNIX systems integrator; Windows to UNIX/Linux Client-Server Specialist; Secure E-Mail & Website Hosting; Thoroughbred Software Developer; Custom Industrial Automation; Hardware & Electronics Experts; In Business Since 1985.


http://echo3.net/ Unix/Linux Custom Applications, Web Hosting, C/C++ Programming Courses


http://www.m3ipinc.com Security, firewalls, ids, audits, vulnerability assesments, BS7799, HIPAA, GLB, incident handling



Twitter
  • Nov 21 07:55
    @loudmouthman: correct, but how do you prove ANYTHING like that is accurate? You can't. A text file is no better or worse than anything.
  • Nov 21 07:40
    @loudmouthman: well, a digital signature could prove it hadn't been altered. Text is no more insecure than anything else in that sense.









Change Congress


Related Posts


Publish your articles, comments, book reviews or opinions here!