Get APLawrence.com by RSSThe Tangled Mess That Is UNIX's Family Tree
Tue Jul 27 14:58:52 2004 The Tangled
Mess That Is UNIX's Family Tree
Posted by BigDumbDinosaur
Search Keys: Linux, UNIX, lawsuit, Novell, Caldera, IBM, Open
Source
Most who regularly poke around on this site know that UNIX's origins can be traced back to at least 1969. It was then, so the story goes, that Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie, both employees at Bell Labs in New Jersey, found themselves staring at a beat-up DEC PDP-7 minicomputer, wondering how to get the thing to play some games. Of course, if you wish to include Multics in the picture you can go back to at least 1965. (As an aside, Bill Gates was just nine years old at the time, and had reached the ripe old age of 13 when Thompson started playing with that old PDP-7.)
I've always known that UNIX's geneology is a complex one, but I guess I never really appreciated just how complex it was until this SCO lawsuit mess started. So in the spirit of being well informed about who "owns" what in the world of UNIX, prepare to become cross-eyed when you get a load of this UNIX timeline.
More Articles by BigDumbDinosaur
/BDD/B1018.html copyright July 2004 BigDumbDinosaur All Rights Reserved
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
I sell and support
Kerio Mail server
Click here to add your comments
And this is something a judge is supposed to understand..
--TonyLawrence
---July 28, 2004
Hrmpf.
It all depends on what you call "Unix". Unix as a OS, as code, is definately AT&T's baby.
But saying that AT&T invented "Unix" as we understand it today, is like saying that Karl Benz invented the automobile.
Sure he created the first one that had a internal combustion motor and was practical, but it would be silly to say that everything that looks like his creation and follows the same basic design criteria is infringing on his design.
SCO may own rights to distribute the code and rights to the Unix trademark, but I am sure that places like Open Group and their Unix specification would beg to differ SCO "owning" and every innovation based on Unix design in the universe...
Seems like Unix is more of a community project then the darling of any one corporation. To me it's a OS-type, like lower-case "unix". A family of operating systems based on a common anscestry.
Doubt it would stand up in court, but it can be a valid arguement in my eyes. A sort of de-facto standard.
oh and don't forget the Windows history preview.
http://www.levenez.com/windows/history.html
--Drag
Well, the Windows one is nowhere near as convoluted, which you'd expect, seeing as how only one vendor was involved in its development. However, in more recent years, Windows' lineage has become pretty tangled, which you wouldn't expect, seeing as how only one vendor was involved in its development.
--BigDumbDinosaur
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar