Union mounts for Linux.
There, wasn't that helpful?
Just kidding: So what's a union mount? Imagine you have a
directory with files in it, and you then mount some device on that
directory. Ordinarily, the original files would no longer be
available, but a union mount leaves them visible: you can see both
the files from the device you mounted and the files that were
originally in the directory you mounted it on.
Yes, Mac has this also.
This mixing raises interesting problems - for example what happens if there are identically named files? I'm not going to go into the details of all this here because it takes a lot of space and it makes my head hurt, but this is where whiteouts come into play. The basic issue is that the "upper" layer is the last thing mounted, and although everything below is visible, if you want to delete something in the lower layer, you really can't; a "whiteout" in the upper layer makes it seem to be deleted.
Union mounts have been available in BSD and Mac OS 10, see http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/project-unionfs.html for Linux. Interestingly, unionfs allows you to create snapshots.
If you really want to know about whiteouts, go read
A common use is in Live Cd's: the read only cd file system is paired with a writeable file system on a hard drive.
More Articles by Tony Lawrence - Find me on Google+
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Sun Nov 19 10:43:37 2006: drag
Oh, UnionFS is nice. Lots of flexibility.
For instance I wanted to have a Linux install on a USB key. It would operate in similar fasion to 'live linux cdroms' but instead of having the top layer of the stack be in tmpfs it would be writing out to the usb pen drive.
By using Squashfs (read only compressed file system) I was able to make the equivelent of 1.3 or so gigs of disk space compress down to under 700 megs. I don't remember the actual amount. Using Unionfs I was able to make it seems fully writable and have this be persistant through reboots.
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar