I'm sure you have read about Google agreeing to censor search results for Chinese users. There are two basic opinions on this: one side holds that censoring is disgusting and the other says it's better to allow them something than nothing at all.
I'm conflicted on this. I lean toward the side of "just say no", but I wonder how many people who say Google should take the moral high ground are willing to take that to its logical end? After all, Walmart and a lot of other stores are full of products made by Chinese workers who often are laboring under conditions that would be illegal here. Should we ban the importation of goods from countries with bad labor laws? Should we also stop buying oil from countries with horrible attitudes toward women or where states force religious conformity?
Well, maybe we should, but I don't think we'd like the consequences. I don't like Google censoring, but there are a lot of things I don't like. As most of us do, I have to make relative moral decisions, and those aren't always easy or comfortable. I don't know what's "right" here. The real "wrong" is China itself, and I could argue that Google holding firm could encourage them to change more quickly. But you could also argue that opening the information door a crack will make it easier to open it more later. Neither choice satisfies me.
More Articles by Anthony Lawrence - Find me on Google+
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Wed Feb 8 18:24:45 2006: BigDumbDinosaur
It could be opined that by continuing to support China by way of importing their goods or by encouraging Google providing censored access to what you and I see in unexpurgated form, we are tacitly condoning what is wrong with the Chi-Com system, especially the dismal handling of basic human rights. But, of course, when it comes to money, morals often get rudely shoved aside in the name of pecuniary gain. Right, Bill?
I'm inclined to agree that some access to Google is better than nothing at all. Sooner or later, information that the Chinese authorities have ruled unacceptable for mass consumption will accidentally find its way through the thicket of censorship and we may witness something akin to what ultimately brought down the "Evil Empire' (and I'm not referring to the one located in Redmond, Washington). Although much was said about the policies of Ronald Reagan and the rhetoric of Pope John Paul II being instrumental in the collapse of the Soviet Union, it was the inrush of unfettered information to the Soviet masses that hasten pestroika and the destruction of the Iron Curtain. There's nothing more powerful than an informed public.
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar