Forget 500,000 songs - I'll use it for backup

It's been all over the blogosphere and even on the nightly news: "500,000 songs on your iPod!". Of course it's nonsense: the technology referred to is still years away, and as it is likely to appear in expensive forms long before Apple could adopt it for mass consumer use, the first products will probably be Enterprise storage devices and not iPods.

By the way, this isn't really "news" - IBM has been working on this for several years now. All that's new is that they've built a prototype.

This is called "racetrack" memory because the storage moves around a circuit. Strangely enough, that's been a problem: moving the bits has been slow, roughly equal to hard drive speeds. That's not so horrible: a solid state, high capacity low power device that is "only" as fast as a hard drive is still a big improvement, but apparently the physics of this are still being worked on and may be able to be solved.

I think the video at Engadget shows IBM's prototype : it definitely isn't anything ready to pop in an iPod.

3 comments

More Articles by Anthony Lawrence - Find me on Google+

Click here to add your comments




Thu Apr 17 13:16:45 2008:   BigDumbDinosaur
http://bcstechnology.net

"500,000 songs on your iPod!"

Who would have time to listen to a half million songs? If you listened non-stop eight hours a day, seven days a week, and each song averaged three minutes in length, it would take you nearly nine years to play all of them. Since much of what passes for "music" these days is crap, it sounds to me like a supreme waste of time. I won't even mention the time it would take to download all those MP3s and store them into the iPod.<Grin>

As far as storage speed goes, I have little doubt that problem will be solved. Solid-state technology has consistently gotten faster over time and research on improving semiconductor switching speeds keeps yielding fruit.



Thu Jun 5 14:46:00 2008:   TonyLawrence


Speaking of storage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBRAM





Thu Jun 5 17:31:42 2008:   BigDumbDinosaur
http://bcstechnology.net

CBRAM has a lot of potential. Switching speeds can be exceptionally high, the current required to change a bit state is a fraction of that required with flash memory, and it appears cell density can be many times that of the latter. I foresee where CBRAM could eventually display all forms of mechanical storage, effectively resulting in the demise of the hard drive as we know it. Imagine a server with terabytes of storage packed into a device that you could stick in your shirt pocket and have room left over for a pack of cancer sticks.

Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email

Click here to add your comments

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar

Jump to Comments

Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.

Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.

We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.