Slashdot pointed me to this RTF EULA article. It's amusing, but also a little disturbing, because we are smothered by so much legalese that most of us pay little or no attention and just numbly sign or click our agreement. Have you ever had a mortgage? The TV ads showing four foot high piles of paperwork are only slightly exaggerated. Who knows what you are really agreeing to? Mortgages, EULA's and all the other things we basically ignore can contain terms we really don't like and shouldn't accept. Yet we need the mortgage, we need the OS or application, so we dutifully agree to whatever is presented.
With mortgages and other consumer transactions, we usually have at least some protection because of laws that try to protect us from outright chicanery. With EULA's, outrageous terms may or may not be enforceable, but we seldom even know what terms are stated at all.
Well, as that article points out, often the companies whose EULA you clicked either don't seem to know their own terms or don't care very much about them. In spite of clauses that may say certain products can't be criticized or reviewed, people do just that all over the web, and haven't been sued. In many cases, the EULA couldn't really prevent that anyway: the best they could do is revoke your license to use the software, which is water under the bridge to many reviewers who aren't using the software after the review anyway.
Maybe we should just kill all the lawyers.
More Articles by Tony Lawrence - Find me on Google+
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Wed Oct 26 13:39:45 2005: BigDumbDinosaur
In spite of clauses that may say certain products can't be criticized or reviewed, people do just that all over the web, and haven't been sued.
According to one of my lawyer clients, such clauses have been deemed unenforceable by the courts on First Amendment grounds as too broad and vague. Of course, that would only matter in the USA -- critics in other countries might want to watch their backs. <Smile>
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar