Microsoft announced at last week's Intel Developer Forum that it will not support UEFI in Vista. I'm sure that most of the crowd shrugged their shoulders and didn't give that a second thought, but this could be another Microsoft blunder.
Update: UEFI was added to Vista in their SP1. Windows Server 2008 also has this as does Win 7.
Linux supports EFI, and the new Intel Apples actually are EFI systems. It would seem obvious that Microsoft should be moving on this more quickly than it is. While some Windows analysts say Microsoft just doesn't see any market demand, I think that they are having so many problems with Vista as it is that they are willing to sacrifice just about anything to get it out the door.
Why is EFI important? Because as its name implies, this is an extensible firmware: low level drivers can be added to this. It is OS agnostic, and it's not all that low level: there's even an EFI shell, and you can develop EFI applications. The whole thing is written in C and runs in a flat memory model, making it much easier to program and to port.
Some writers say that geek level tech stuff like this is unimportant, which would imply that Microsoft is correct. But when PC users start noticing the new Macs lightning fast boot, maybe it does start becoming important. Seeing Target Disk Mode for the first time should make any PC user's jaw drop also (that was available with Macs before EFI because of Open Firmware).
PC Magazine says Microsoft's EFI Pullback is Apple's Gain. They are right.
Read more about EFI at kernelthread.com's More Power to Firmware.
UEFI Home Page: http://uefi.org/
More Articles by Anthony Lawrence - Find me on Google+
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar