In the beginning, when large creatures lumbered through damp tropical forests and furry mammals hid quivering in their burrows, "ps" had no built in abilty to change its sort order. You got what it gave, and if you wanted it otherwise, you ran it through "sort" yourself. That is the Unix Way: small tools, working together with pipelines.
BSD mucked with that a bit, adding a "-m" option that sorted by memory usage, instead of by process ID. As that's a pretty common desire, I doubt anyone saw that as an offense to the Unix gods, though really it was. But it was convenient, wasn't it?
But now Linux ps adds something much more nasty. Not only does Linux ps have a built-in "--sort" option (added by Charles Blake, so says the man page), it also overloads "-O" which originally was used for user defined formats (specifying the fields you want to see) to do the same thing. Sacrilege! The sanctity of the Unix Way is violated by this insertion. Do you see what happens when you let the camel poke his nose in the tent? That little "-m" was so convenient, and now look at this mess! Pretty soon ps will be drawing graphs and outputting html!
I'm only half kidding. Linux ps with --sort can be convenient, but it is also feature bloat and I'm not entirely happy to see that. Too much camel in the tent, I think.
More Articles by Tony Lawrence - Find me on Google+
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar