Sun Nov 28 12:14:44 2004 Sun offering
free, open source Solaris 10 - not quite yet
Posted by Tony Lawrence
Search Keys: solaris
Referencing: http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=106224
II'm reading everywhere that Sun is making Solaris 10 free and open source ( http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=106224).
However, that's not quite true yet: if you go to their download pages, you;ll have to accept a license that says (among other things):
2.0 LIMITED LICENSE Sun grants You a non-exclusive and non-transferable license to internally reproduce and use Software solely for purpose of evaluation in a test environment. Software shall not be used in a production environment. (Refer to Section 5.2 for reporting requirements)Apparently the free, open source version won't be available till later - maybe January. I'm downloading the release available now, but haven't installed it yet.
This is supposed to include complete Linux capability. According to Sun:
We've made Solaris 10 the most interoperable operating system platform ever. Linux applications will run on Solaris 10--natively. No emulation, complication, no performance hit.
I admit to having always liked Solaris. I wasn't overly impressed by their earlier x86 releases, but maybe this one will be different.
Moved some comments to the main text so they don't get wiped out:
---November 28, 2004 I downloaded the iso images, burned them, and did the install. I thought it was going pretty well until it asked for the "Documentation" CD - unfortunately, there is no such thing on the download page. I continued without it, and upon reboot it looked like things might be good, but it then failed to start X. I could login, but no X. I've seen this same thing with RedHat? and other Linuxes too: you do a graphical install, and obviously that is perfectly happy with your graphics. Yet when the system comes up, it has no understanding of it. Maybe I can fix it, maybe I can't - I may have to throw a simpler graphics card in the machine and try again. It's annoying that they at least don't default to whatever they used for the install - that may not be high-res and I may want to try to make it better, but at least it WORKED. If anyone can explain why this isn't just automatic, I'd sure appreciate it. --TonyLawrence ---December 1, 2004 Don't know. Does Solaris use XFree86? I think it's something that has been improved with X.org. Or does Solaris use it's own X server that isn't something that I am familar with... You can see how smart X is at configuring itself automaticly by running XFree86 -configure or Xorg -configure Then it will automaticly generate a configuration file inside your current directory. Then you test it with: XFree86 -xf86config XF86Config.new or Xorg -config xorg.conf.new That way you can find out how smart the autodetect stuff is. If they work, don't use those config files directly. They won't have DRI setup (I think) and will miss out on system-specific configurations like modules or font paths, but you can edit in the relevent parts into your /etc/X11/XF86Config or /etc/X11/xorg.conf I don't know why they don't do at least that sometimes. Or at least provide a compatability vesa/vga mode like window's "safe mode". They should. --Drag
More Articles by Tony Lawrence - Find me on Google+
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Wed Feb 16 21:28:37 2005: tony8ktony
Finally,Sun Micro might have its finger on the pulse.If they can get more and more users hooked on to Sun Solaris x86 even if it means free distribution of the software to all home users/developers/etc in just two countries,INDIA & CHINA they will capture the global market in the next few years.I have installed solaris 5.10 atleast a dozen times if not more and here might be your answer:
1)The solaris 10 is an excellent OS
2)You need to meet the basic minimum hardware requirements
3)The problem that you mention is most likely due to display and for that you need to make sure your monitor is compatible
4)If the hardware(read monitor,memory,etc are ok)you will see Graphical User Interface (CDE & Java Desktop)
Wish you luck.
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar